OBC 2006 › Division B
4.1.8.16.
Version 0 — in force 31 December 2006
This looks wrong
Tell us what is wrong and we will verify & correct our mapping.
- Edition
- OBC_2006
- Division
- B
- Provision
- 4.1.8.16.
- Version
- v0
(1) This Regulation comes into force on December 31, 2006.
Read directly from the regulation's own commencement section.
O. Reg. 350/06 · commencement 2.2.1.1(1)
This version stayed in force until the next edition replaced it. What follows is that edition’s base regulation’s commencement — the takeover that ended this one.
(1) Subject to Sentences (2) and (3), this Regulation comes into force on January 1, 2014.
Read directly from the regulation's own commencement section.
O. Reg. 332/12 · commencement 4.4.1.1(1)
This looks wrong
Tell us what is wrong and we will verify & correct our mapping.
- Edition
- OBC_2006
- Division
- B
- Provision
- 4.1.8.16.
- Version
- v0
(1) This Regulation comes into force on December 31, 2006.
Read directly from the regulation's own commencement section.
O. Reg. 350/06 · commencement 2.2.1.1(1)
This version stayed in force until the next edition replaced it. What follows is that edition’s base regulation’s commencement — the takeover that ended this one.
(1) Subject to Sentences (2) and (3), this Regulation comes into force on January 1, 2014.
Read directly from the regulation's own commencement section.
O. Reg. 332/12 · commencement 4.4.1.1(1)
Provenance
OBC 1997 · renumbered from 4.1.9.4. — Pro
Base · O. Reg. 350/06 · ext← current
Original — base regulation
OBC 2012 · continues as 4.1.8.16. — Pro
4.1.8.16. — Foundation Provisions
(1) Foundations shall be designed to resist the lateral load capacity of the SFRS, except that when the foundations are allowed to rock, the design forces for the foundation need not exceed those determined in Sentence 4.1.8.7.(1) using an RdRo equal to 2.0.
(2) The design of foundations shall be such that they are capable of transferring earthquake loads and effects between the building and the ground without exceeding the capacities of the soil and rock.
(3) In cases where IEFaSa(0.2) is equal to or greater than 0.35, the following requirements shall be satisfied:
(a) piles or pile caps, drilled piers, and caissons shall be interconnected by continuous ties in no fewer than two directions,
(b) piles, drilled piers, and caissons shall be embedded a minimum of 100 mm into the pile cap or structure, and
(c) piles, drilled piers, and caissons, other than wood piles, shall be connected to the pile cap or structure for a minimum tension force equal to 0.15 times the factored compression load on the pile.
(4) At sites where IEFaSa(0.2) is equal to or greater than 0.35, basement walls shall be designed to resist earthquake lateral pressures from backfill or natural ground.
(5) At sites where IEFaSa(0.2) is greater than 0.75, the following requirements shall be satisfied:
(a) piles, drilled piers, or caissons shall be designed and detailed to accommodate cyclic inelastic behaviour when the design moment in the element due to earthquake effects is greater than 75% of its moment capacity, and
(b) spread footings founded on soil defined as Site Class E or F shall be interconnected by continuous ties in no fewer than two directions.
(6) Each segment of a tie between elements that is required by Clauses (3)(a) or (5)(b) shall be designed to carry by tension or compression a horizontal force at least equal to the greatest factored pile cap or column vertical load in the elements it connects, multiplied by a factor of 0.10 IEFaSa(0.2), unless it can be demonstrated that equivalent restraints can be provided by other means.
(7) The potential for liquefaction of the soil and its consequences, such as significant ground displacement and loss of soil strength and stiffness, shall be evaluated based on the ground motion parameters referenced in Subsection 1.1.2. and shall be taken into account in the design of the structure and its foundations.
Editor's note
In Sentence 4.1.8.16.(6), the as-filed O. Reg. 350/06 reads 'required by Clauses (3)(a) or (5)(b)' (plural); this map reproduces the source as filed. The e-Laws consolidation renders the cross-reference in the singular ('Clause'). This wording difference was not enacted by an amending regulation.
Provenance
OBC 1997 · renumbered from 4.1.9.4. — Pro
Base · O. Reg. 350/06 · ext← current
Original — base regulation
OBC 2012 · continues as 4.1.8.16. — Pro